Vatican II “NewChurch” vs. The Apostate Church

Vatican II “NewChurch” vs. The Apostate Church

By:  Eric Gajewski

Blessed Emmerich notes the difference…

Archbishop Lefebvre properly resists

I have touched upon this topic in times past, however, it is important, to return to this discussion, so that, we, can properly identify, who is, remaining faithful to Catholic doctrine.  There are many “popular” apologists and commentators, who are now, beginning, to wake up, to the reality, that, there is an anti-Church within the Church.  That is good, right?  Well, not exactly.  The problem is these same apologists and writers identify it as something new?  As if the “anti-Church” just showed up with Francis. BIG MISTAKE!  Somehow Francis and his liberal cohorts are “the anti-Church” and they are not?  Dead wrong!   They do not consider the Second Vatican Council as a problem and thus they actually are contributing to the Church’s destruction (objectively speaking).  Somehow, along the way, we have forgotten, Archbishop Lefebvre’s analysis in this crisis.  “…it is impossible for us to take any part in this conspiracy despite the fact that there may be many satisfactory declarations in Vatican II. The good texts have served as cover to get those texts which are snares, equivocal, and denuded of meaning, accepted and passed.”   With so many “dabbling” and faltering due to pseudo-traditionalism these days, this article, is, simply, a reminder that those prescribing to Vatican II hold to “NewChurch” principles and not Catholic ones.

We have recently seen a rise in overall awareness that “something is terribly wrong” with churchmen in the Church.  For argument’s sake let me use an analysis.  Vatican II in reality is a cancer and the false traditionalists of our days often only see it as a “cold’ (if that).  Cancer kills.  A cold, the vast majority of the time, will not.  

It is not that bad they say.  Stay away from the Council they say.  

It is only some of the “creative interpretations” by the local diocese or liberal media they say.  Well, Lefebvre answered the false traditionalist’s, of our times, like Burke and Schneider and says this, “Some say the Council was good and has good, but only the reform is bad. But that is not true! Why? Because when Rome gave the reform, they always say the reforms they do, they do in the name of the Council. In the name of the Council! It is evident that all reform came from the Council, and if the reform is bad, it is impossible that the Council is good and all reforms are bad. Because that is the authentic interpretation of the Council by Rome!”   

It is clear how Rome is interpreting the Council and its not in any Catholic sense.  It pertains to this “cult of man” established by Paul the 6^th.  A cult which no Catholic can have the hopes of saving their soul in objectively speaking.  The doctrines were bad AND the reform was bad.  BOTH.  It is time for the “false traddies” to truly wake up and realize they simply have been wrong all along.  Even Pope Benedict XVI said Vatican II was an attempted merger between the Revolution and the Church.   

I didn’t say he did.  So quit telling me to stay away from the council’s text’s.  

 For it is you who need educating.   

So, if they hold the authentic interpretation of the Council we must clearly conclude that it is they who are simply in error.  End of story.  No more excuses for the Council.  No more excuses for the New Mass which came from the Masons, heretics and Jews.  The man who does not properly point out what is ailing him might die.  A doctor is not being hateful by telling another man this even as I say that Vatican II is a cancer.  There is a big difference between viewing the Vatican II as a “cold” rather than stage 5 cancer.

Anyways, the cancer will eventually kill.  A wrong diagnosis may “kill” your soul.  That is how important doctrine is.  Thus, Vatican II NewChurch, which is materially heretical and is in a material schism will soon give way to the formal schism.   

Wait, I am confused Eric?  So where is the Church?   
  
Where will the Church be during the formal schism or this Apostate Church spoken of?   

Due to the material heresies of Vatican II no faithful Catholic ought be in those buildings wherein it is taught.  Where heresy is a Catholic cannot be.  We cannot say that these Popes and prelates are not members of the Church (generally speaking) but the day is coming when we will all have to make a decision.  A BIG DECISION.  Do I deny Christ and follow the antichrist and take his mark?  Do I try to fit in with the world and sit next to heretics and pagans in a “church” and sing KOOMBAYA together with them?  That day is coming.  This Apostate Church coming will not at all be the Catholic Church.  This is where “hardline traditionalists” like myself and sedevacantists disagree.  They say the formal schism has occurred.  It hasn’t.  The heresies remain on the material level not formal.  We could debate back and forth for days without ever agreeing.  Such is the times. 

Blessed Emmerich, in her writings, makes a clear distinction, between, the “new heterodox church of Rome and the “Apostate Church of Darkness in Rome”.  Both seemed similar she said.   

It is because the Conciliar principles are in place for the coming Apostate Church of Darkness.   

You know Vatican II “doctrine”.  The rights of man, human dignity babble, democracy, social justice/socialism, etc.  It is all moving man toward the formal Religion of the Man of Lawlessness.   You will notice how Blessed Emmerich said both of these “churches” reside in Rome.  Take your Pepto my modernist friend.  She is a real saint not the phony revolutionary ones of the “cult of man”.  Rome is about to turn to Masonic secular humanism.

“I saw that many of the instruments in the new Church, such as spears and darts, were meant to be used against the living Church. Everyone dragged in something different: clubs, rods, pumps, cudgels, puppets, mirrors, trumpets, horns bellows – all sorts of things. In the cave below (the sacristy) some people kneaded bread, but nothing came of it; it would not rise. The men in the little mantles brought wood to the steps of the pulpit to make a fire. They puffed and blew and labored hard, but the fire would not burn. All they produced was smoke and fumes. Then they broke a hole in the roof and ran up a pipe, but the smoke would not rise, and the whole place became black and suffocating. Some blew the horns so violently that the tears streamed from their eyes. All in this church belonged to the earth, returned to the earth. All was dead, the work of human skill, a church of the latest style, a church of man’s invention like the new heterodox church in Rome.”  ~ Blessed Emmerick

In the end, most do not realize this, but the NEO-SSPX now calls Vatican II a “legitimate” Council and not the “robber Council” that Archbishop Lefebvre told us.  We can’t accept this.  Vatican II will not stand the test of time.   

You won’t hear that Vatican II is the basis of a new religion in the false trad circles these days and thus they remain in error. 

Let us hear the St. Athanasius of our times speak yet again.   “This Council gives the same rights to error as to Truth! That is impossible…This new faith, it is a new religion. It is a protestant religion. That is a fact! How is it possible that the Pope gives the authorization to this change? How it is possible that the pope can sign this constitution (on liturgical change)? It is a deep mystery…If I take the position of the Council, I am betraying my Mother Church.” (Archbishop Lefebvre, conference, 1976)  Or how about this quote.  “We are now faced with a grave choice: either we agree with the Council’s Declaration on Religious Freedom, and thus oppose the teachings of the Popes, or we agree with the teachings of the popes, and thus disagree with Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Freedom. It is impossible to subscribe to both. I have made my choice: I choose Tradition. I cling to Tradition over novelty which is merely an expression of Liberalism, the very Liberalism condemned by the Holy See for a century and a half. Now this Liberalism has penetrated the Church through the Council, and its catchwords remain the same; liberty, equality and fraternity.  

   Archbishop Lefebvre maintained , that, although, those following Vatican II, were baptized as members of the Church, due to them following, material heresy, they have become complicit with the "anti-Church"  John Paul II included!

Still more?  “If we are to understand fully and to measure the harm done by Vatican II, we must study this Council in the light of the Pontifical documents which, for nearly two centuries, put bishops, clergy and faithful on their guard against the conspiracy of the enemies of the Church acting through Liberalism and Modernism. It is also essential to know the documents of the opponents of the Church, and especially of the secret societies which had been preparing for this Council for more than a century. Finally, it will be very instructive to follow the reactions of Protestants, Masons and Liberal “Catholics” during and after the Council.”    

Shall I continue with more evidence?  “This Second Vatican Council Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.   

To say or imply Vatican II was a “Catholic council” is dangerous.  To say we can ignore the 5-10 percent error in the Council and still call it legit is absolutely absurd.  The Holy Ghost does not teach heresy and heresy is found over and over in the Council.  Religious liberty being just one of them.   

In the end, let me say, that, at least, hardline traditionalists and sedevacantists agree that we are dealing with heresy and something altogether “alien” to the faith and thus we must pray hard for these false traditionalists to wake up.  They are already on a very dangerous path.

Adding to that, what is beyond frightening, is the fact, that, the majority of self-professed Catholics, don’t see, that, they are being led into a formalized One World Religion.  

Dont take the Vatican II "cheese"

“Then I saw an apparition of the Mother of God, and she said that the tribulation would be very great. She added that people must pray fervently with outstretched arms, be it only long enough to say three Our Fathers. This was the way her Son prayed for them on the Cross. They must rise at twelve at night, and pray in this manner; and they must keep coming to the Church. They must pray above all for the Church of Darkness to leave Rome…”  Blessed Emmerick

COMMENT BELOW!

Blessed Emmerick's Endtime Prophecy (Formal Schism of Rome)

 

***AFTER each blog going forward (on the website itself) you will see a section that says "comment". You can click that and then make a post "anonymously" or use your google+ account....if you select anonymous you can then simply add your name to the top of your message to identify yourself...COMMENTING NOW PERMITTED

If I get booted off of social media this is a way to stay in contact…

Questions, comments and suggestions? Email me at apostleofmary@hotmail.com

Donations: Please get behind TradCatKnight financially if you feel you have benefited from the material I present.  I appreciate all your prayers and support!  I also appreciate the letters coming in as well!  For CASH contributions please email me at apostleofmary@hotmail.com for the mailing address.