Vatican II “NewChurch” vs. The
Apostate Church
By:
Eric Gajewski
Blessed Emmerich
notes the difference…
Archbishop Lefebvre properly resists
I have
touched upon this topic in times past, however, it is important, to return to
this discussion, so that, we, can properly identify, who is, remaining faithful
to Catholic doctrine. There are many “popular”
apologists and commentators, who are now, beginning, to wake up, to the reality,
that, there is an anti-Church within the Church. That is good, right? Well, not exactly. The problem is these same apologists and
writers identify it as something new? As
if the “anti-Church” just showed up with Francis. BIG MISTAKE! Somehow Francis and his liberal cohorts are “the
anti-Church” and they are not? Dead
wrong! They do not consider the Second Vatican
Council as a problem and thus they actually are contributing to the Church’s
destruction (objectively speaking).
Somehow, along the way, we have forgotten, Archbishop Lefebvre’s analysis
in this crisis. “…it is impossible for us to take any part in
this conspiracy despite the fact that there may be many satisfactory
declarations in Vatican II. The good texts have served as cover to get
those texts which are snares, equivocal, and denuded of meaning, accepted and
passed.” With so many “dabbling” and
faltering due to pseudo-traditionalism these days, this article, is, simply, a
reminder that those prescribing to Vatican II hold to “NewChurch” principles
and not Catholic ones.
