FEAR or FAITH? FRIGHT or FLIGHT?
Welcome Eagles to the New Crusade!
Will thou help defend the Fortress of Faith?

BOOKMARK us & check in DAILY for the latest Endtimes News!
SPREAD WORD TO YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY!

"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven,
saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Bergoglio is NOT “peacefully and universally” accepted as Pope

Bergoglio is NOT “peacefully and universally” accepted as Pope
I was the first to come out publicly and say Francis was an antipope and told you the trend would be that He would be held as such.  Benedict XVI is the true Pope (Endtimes Pope to flee Rome) Some years later it has already come to fruition.
One of the arguments you will hear effeminates make, desperately trying to avoid acknowledging the reality of the Bergoglian Antipapacy qua Antipapacy, is that Bergoglio is the Pope because he is “peacefully and universally accepted” as such by The Church.  The Church, being indefectible, therefore, could never make such a mistake.



We could go down several rabbit holes here, the most obvious of which are the questions of truth being determined by popular opinion (aka mob rule), and the question of who, exactly, gets a “vote” in determining what is true – does Nancy Pelosi get a vote? Does James Martin, Ethh-jay, get a vote? Does Cardinal Coccopalmerio (spiritual father of the cocaine gay orgy set) get a vote?  Like I said, rabbit holes, and deep ones at that.
But those questions are not what this piece is about.  This piece is about disabusing one and all of the lie that Antipope Bergoglio is “peacefully and universally accepted to be Pope Francis”. He is not.
My sources in Rome (whom I think have proved themselves) have said for a while now, and reconfirmed recently, that there is talk inside the Curia of Bergoglio being an antipope.  Among this population, the consensus is that “there is nothing we can do except wait for Bergoglio to die”.  This notion that “there is nothing we can do” is, of course, completely wrong and is a pure function of effeminacy.  As I have said many times before, ONE PRESS CONFERENCE COULD CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY.  One. Press. Conference.
Let it be noted that these same people never sat around and discussed whether or not Pope Benedict XVI (before his failed attempt to half-resign) was the Pope, or whether JPII was the Pope.  Some of these men disliked Ratzinger, and some disliked JPII, but no one questioned whether or not these men were the Pope.  But Bergoglio?  Oh yes, whether or not Bergoglio is the Pope is a real, serious topic of conversation inside the Vatican, and has been for years now.  It is also a topic of conversation among an ever-growing number of priests, and there are a growing number of priests that say the Mass of the Ages who commemorate either “the Pope” without saying a name, or who commemorate Pope Benedict by name at the Te Igitur.
So, that does away with the “universality” argument.  Now to the question of “peace”.  My Roman sources reconfirm that the Curia, Bishops and Cardinals are nearly all “scared witless” of Bergoglio.  The few remaining Catholics are terrified of what further damage Bergoglio is going to do (eliminate priestly celibacy, female ordination, promulgate a new, non-Catholic faux-Mass, etc.) Almost all of the rest of them are terrified of losing their position, career track, and, as I have been screaming for years now, being taken down by the near-universal connection to sodomy and the sexual abuse of children and seminarians.  I think it is safe to say that there is not one Catholic bishop alive today that is more than one degree of separation from a sodomite scandal.  Every bishop COULD be intimidated, coerced or blackmailed with, at the very least, the charge of “why didn’t you do something” or “why did you look the other way?”  I covered that HERE. Obedience to the “pope” has nothing to do with it.  They’re all blackmailable.
So, would you call that “peace”?
Would you call North Korea a “peaceful” society?  Walk the streets of North Korea and I’m sure you will find them to be quiet and even orderly.  Tell the people of North Korea how their society is an example of “peace”, and how fortunate they are to get to live under the “peaceful” Kim regime.  After all, the North Koreans UNIVERSALLY accept the Kim regime, don’t they?  Nevermind the mortal fear every one of them lives under every day.  Details, details….
And make no mistake, for the Vatican to be analogized to North Korea is exactly what Bergoglio wants.  Bergoglio is a Diabolical Narcissist Psychopath.  His obsession is POWER.  All he cares about is his own personal power, of which money and sex are subsets, and his appetite is insatiable. Bergoglio hates God and is trying to prove that he is more powerful than God.  Exactly like Lucifer.
Peace isn’t the absence of war, folks.  Peace is the perfect application of Justice in Charity.
I wrote the following piece in December of ARSH 2011, before any one of us had ever heard the accursed name of Bergoglio.  I wrote it about the former United States.  I republish it now, unaltered, and its application to the Bergoglian Antipapcy is even more direct and clear than to the former U.S. in the throes of the Obama/Clinton regime.